All this tacitly assumes that taking those risks and doing that haste was _right_, that they are good and daring heroes for doing so, rather than vain daredevils who wanted to do it fast in order to stick it to geopolitical rivals. Why _do_ we need to "take risks" like that rather than abort when something goes awry?
All this tacitly assumes that taking those risks and doing that haste was _right_, that they are good and daring heroes for doing so, rather than vain daredevils who wanted to do it fast in order to stick it to geopolitical rivals. Why _do_ we need to "take risks" like that rather than abort when something goes awry?