Faster, Please!

Faster, Please!

Share this post

Faster, Please!
Faster, Please!
⚔️🎇 Why the US military should plan for human-level AI

⚔️🎇 Why the US military should plan for human-level AI

The Pentagon must be ready for anything, even as Silicon Valley keeps it foot on the pedal

James Pethokoukis's avatar
James Pethokoukis
Feb 14, 2025
∙ Paid
4

Share this post

Faster, Please!
Faster, Please!
⚔️🎇 Why the US military should plan for human-level AI
1
Share

My fellow pro-growth Up Wingers,

When German physicists split the atom in 1938, the historic event’s military implications were crystal clear to scientists across the Atlantic. That moment of awareness and reaction is depicted in the 2023 film Oppenheimer. When the stunning news reaches Robert Oppenheimer and his fellow physicists at the University of California, Berkeley, they immediately grasp the breakthrough’s enormous potential as the basis for a devastating superweapon:

Ernest Lawrence (Josh Hartnett): A chain reaction. You’re thinking what I’m thinking.

J. Robert Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy): You, me, and every physicist around the world who’s seen the news.

Luis Walter Alvarez (Alex Wolff ): What? What’re we all thinking?

Oppenheimer: A bomb, Alvarez. A bomb.

The same certainty doesn’t yet apply to artificial intelligence. Though some pundits clamor for a Manhattan Project to beat China in developing human-level AI — and, of course, AI-enhanced and created weapons — they overlook a crucial difference: Nuclear fission offered an obvious path to unprecedented destructive power, while the military potential of today's AI advances remains murky.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Faster, Please! to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 James Pethokoukis
Publisher Privacy ∙ Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share