Faster, Please!

Faster, Please!

Share this post

Faster, Please!
Faster, Please!
📉 Well, they ran the numbers on degrowth — and it's not good

📉 Well, they ran the numbers on degrowth — and it's not good

Do people in rich countries want to live like they do in India?

James Pethokoukis's avatar
James Pethokoukis
Nov 15, 2024
∙ Paid
13

Share this post

Faster, Please!
Faster, Please!
📉 Well, they ran the numbers on degrowth — and it's not good
Share

Advocates of degrowth argue, essentially, that humanity can have a better, more fulfilling existence with less stuff. Wellbeing over GDP growth. Simple enough. All that needs to happen is intentionally downsizing production and consumption so all our economic activity fits within Earth's supposed ecological limits. (Of course, rich nations have a special burden to reduce their resource use to ensure global equity.)

Suppose the degrowth notion appeals to you. Wonderful, fine, whatever. But don’t think that on the other side of that anti-technocapitalist, anti-abundance vision is some solarpunkian, green-dream utopia where human habitation is harmoniously fused with ecological principles. You won't get a world that looks like the above image.

What would a degrowth world really look like? A key part of the degrowth scenario gets put to the test in “The labour and resource use requirements of a good life for all” by sustainability researchers Chris McElroy (University of Vermont) and Daniel W. O’Neill (University of Barcelona). They offer a data-driven look at reducing consumption to meet basic needs, a core degrowth proposal.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Faster, Please! to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 James Pethokoukis
Publisher Privacy ∙ Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share