Listen now | Faster, Please! — The Podcast #93
While I love most of your stuff James, this guest choice doesn’t help because his epistemic commitments are not well validated.
I don’t agree with you Simon. I actually sometimes find Pielke Jr. to be too cautious when it comes to climate and energy.
By 'epistemic commitments' do you mean 'his conclusions'? If so, give the best example of a conclusion you find poorly validated.
Interesting. Where is he too cautious in your view? And how does his caution level speak to my concern about his epistemic commitments— I’m not sure I see the link?
While I love most of your stuff James, this guest choice doesn’t help because his epistemic commitments are not well validated.
I don’t agree with you Simon. I actually sometimes find Pielke Jr. to be too cautious when it comes to climate and energy.
By 'epistemic commitments' do you mean 'his conclusions'? If so, give the best example of a conclusion you find poorly validated.
Interesting. Where is he too cautious in your view? And how does his caution level speak to my concern about his epistemic commitments— I’m not sure I see the link?