Faster, Please!

Faster, Please!

🚀 F,P! Week In Review, Briefly

AI & jobs, US-style state capitalism, the business of space

Aug 30, 2025
∙ Paid
2
Share

In case you missed it ...

✋ What are the limits to Trumpian state capitalism? (Monday)

✨ AI is having job effects. And that's OK (Tuesday)

🚀 A Quick Q&A with economist Matt Weinzierl on the growing business of space (Wednesday)


💻 Trump’s Intel stake: deal-making over doctrine (August 25, 2025)

In a Nutshell. Trump’s Intel interventions represent a personalized state capitalism — a product of his taste for deal-making and equity stakes — that comes at the expense of the national interest.

Policy Brief: Under Trump, an ersatz from of industrial policy is happening in the Oval Office. His push to convert $9 billion in promised Intel subsidies into a 10 percent government stake reflects not strategy but a preference for leverage and ownership.

What’s the Deal. After coercing the resignation of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over China ties, Trump struck a shareholder deal making Washington Intel’s largest owner. Similar arrangements have appeared elsewhere in the form of a “golden share” in Nippon Steel, stakes in MP Materials, and revenue-linked deals with Nvidia and AMD. Officials hint more could follow.

Risks. Once a precedent is set, any proclaimed “strategic” industry — autos, batteries, AI — could argue for the same treatment, drifting into dangerous command-economy territory and undermining America’s open-market model. At the same time, the benefits to Intel are uncertain: “Analysts caution that the deal is only a win, by Trump’s terms, if it secures anchor customers for Intel’s advanced chipmaking processes. Seems like a stretch given the company’s chronic troubles. Otherwise, Intel ends up in an even worse bind: financially weaker, strategically constrained, and entangled with government agendas.”

Up Wing Up Shot: US innovation policy has historically delivered returns indirectly through innovation “by moving discoveries quickly into private hands,” not through federal ownership. Trump’s Intel deal conflates public-good investment and personal deal-making, leaving Intel weaker and more politicized.

Share


Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Faster, Please! to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 James Pethokoukis
Publisher Privacy ∙ Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture